[PicForth] Re: -! optimisation problem

[Samuel Tardieu]

>>>>> "David" == David McNab <david at rebirthing.co.nz> writes:

David> With the former, the 24-bit division code was failing. With the
David> latter, it succeeds. Which makes me happy, because lib3 is now
David> pure picforth, with not a single ']asm' cop-out.

Great! When you upload your new version on the wiki, I'll be happy to
add it either in PicForth or as a test case, to make sure that there
are no regressions. When I wrote that the two operations were
equivalent, I was not talking about the status bits whose behaviour
are not covered by Forth :-)

  Sam
-- 
Samuel Tardieu -- sam at rfc1149.net -- http://www.rfc1149.net/sam