[PicForth] Re: picforth conditionals
Samuel Tardieu
sam at rfc1149.net
Thu Mar 11 00:21:04 CET 2004
>>>>> "Jamie" == Jamie Lawson <jlawson at ces.uoguelph.ca> writes:
Jamie> Yes, thanks, that works and looks much cleaner. It even saved
Jamie> 16 words of program memory.
I always read the produced source to find out source of optimizations :)
Jamie> I am using a slightly modified version of picforth-0.29. I am
Jamie> using it with a 16f88 (very close to a 16f876). The changes
Jamie> consist of a few register additions/deletions and the addition
Jamie> of a second configuration word.
I am interested in seeing your changes.
Jamie> You are welcome to look at these changes, but as I mentioned, I
Jamie> am just beginning with Forth. It would be nice to be able to
Jamie> select a processor from the applications source code.
I will look forward into it when I get your changes. I have to find a
clean way of specifying this, as this must be done quite early in the
compilation process.
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- sam at rfc1149.net -- http://www.rfc1149.net/sam
More information about the PicForth
mailing list