[PicForth] Re: Possible 'if' code generation bug

Samuel Tardieu sam at rfc1149.net
Sun Nov 14 14:06:58 CET 2004


>>>>> "Alex" == Alex Holden <alex at linuxhacker.org> writes:

Alex> Great, thanks for the quick response.

You're welcome.

I just released PicForth 1.1 on http://www.rfc1149.net/devel/picforth
with the following changes since 1.0.1:

** New words  

  + Import conditional compilation words "[IF]", "[ELSE]", "[THEN]",
    "[IFDEF]" and "[IFUNDEF]" from gforth. Suggested by David McNab
    <david at rebirthing.co.nz>.
  + "disallow-optimizations" and "allow-optimizations" allow a finer
    control on PicForth optimizations.

** Bug fixes

  + Test with empty action part and a "else" is now handled properly.
    Bug reported by Alex Holden <alex at linuxhacker.org>.
  + Make include/needs work properly

** Miscellenaous

  + Add more comments to explain PicForth internals
  + Add a note in the documentation about c" working in target mode only.
    Problem reported by Alex Holden <alex at linuxhacker.org>.

 Sam
-- 
Samuel Tardieu -- sam at rfc1149.net -- http://www.rfc1149.net/sam



More information about the PicForth mailing list