[PicForth] Re: Possible 'if' code generation bug
Samuel Tardieu
sam at rfc1149.net
Sun Nov 14 14:06:58 CET 2004
>>>>> "Alex" == Alex Holden <alex at linuxhacker.org> writes:
Alex> Great, thanks for the quick response.
You're welcome.
I just released PicForth 1.1 on http://www.rfc1149.net/devel/picforth
with the following changes since 1.0.1:
** New words
+ Import conditional compilation words "[IF]", "[ELSE]", "[THEN]",
"[IFDEF]" and "[IFUNDEF]" from gforth. Suggested by David McNab
<david at rebirthing.co.nz>.
+ "disallow-optimizations" and "allow-optimizations" allow a finer
control on PicForth optimizations.
** Bug fixes
+ Test with empty action part and a "else" is now handled properly.
Bug reported by Alex Holden <alex at linuxhacker.org>.
+ Make include/needs work properly
** Miscellenaous
+ Add more comments to explain PicForth internals
+ Add a note in the documentation about c" working in target mode only.
Problem reported by Alex Holden <alex at linuxhacker.org>.
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- sam at rfc1149.net -- http://www.rfc1149.net/sam
More information about the PicForth
mailing list